Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Final Research



 

Solar power and nuclear power are considered to be two of the main energy sources. The application of solar power to generate energy is available to all countries worldwide while the application of nuclear power to generate energy is limited; except to technologically developed countries and it is not authorized for all countries to produce it due to its potentially detrimental effects on the world peace. Nuclear energy is the energy produced by splitting apart the nuclei of atoms while solar energy is the energy produced from the absorbance of sun rays. Solar energy has a lot of advantages and its application is considered to be ethically preferrable and better than nuclear energy. However, the advantages of nuclear power can’t be ignored. This report will compare and contrast the ethical issues associated with implementing both solar and nuclear energy.  



Solar power is environmentally safer and cleaner than nuclear power because there is no chemical waste produced during the production of solar energy. In contrast, vast amounts of chemical wastes are produced during the production of nuclear energy due to the emitting of radiation and fallout while processing. The waste of nuclear power is very destructive and it can destroy our universe. Additionally, solar energy is environmentally friendly and so there is no negative impact to the surrounding environment; it doesn’t pollute air, land or water. There is no emission from generating solar energy mainly because the plant is based on panel boards that absorb sun rays and then transfer them to energy. On the other hand, nuclear power is considered to be fatal to the surrounding environment if there was a lack of process knowledge associated with improper control procedures. The radiation and wastes emitted have detrimental effects where land, water, ambient air and people are affected by such a radiation. It has the potential to stop human life at a diameter of more than 2000 km from the point of emission and distortion for people's bodies at longer distances; animals may die and plants stop growing when the radiation of the nuclear power spread around the plant of producing nuclear energy.



Unfortunately, nowadays nuclear weapons are used to threaten people and countries where militaries are using nuclear weapons and bombs to threaten the world peace. The best example to express the implementation of nuclear power is when the USA used nuclear power in the Second World War against Japan against Hiroshima and Nagasaki. People in Hiroshima and Nagasaki are still suffering the bad effects of the nuclear bombs up to this moment. Furthermore, gangs and terrorists threaten to use nuclear weapons for horrifying and murdering people. Nuclear weapons could assist terrorists in carrying out their plans of destroying and killing people. All countries have to pay great attention and due care to the production of nuclear power for the aim of piece.



Although the use of solar energy is shown to be ethically better than nuclear energy, there are some other merits that make the use of nuclear energy better than the use of solar energy.  Nuclear energy has higher efficiency and productivity than solar energy. Nuclear power is reliable and efficient. It can be produced under any conditions and at any time from nuclear power plants unlike the sun energy which requires sun rays to be produced. During the absence of sun rays in the night, the rain, or winter season, it is therefore impossible to generate solar energy; nuclear energy can be produced during day and night times. Additionally, the productivity of nuclear plants is higher than the productivity of solar plants. Nuclear plants produce a big amount of electricity unlike sun energy plants. The nuclear power plant doesn't require such a big space as other energy plants and it has to be built on the coast where only small space is required. It is called green because it doesn’t participate in producing CO2 and other gases which are the main source of global warming and ozone depletion. The nuclear energy is considered to be sustainable because it is planned to be used for long years and the raw materials for the generation of nuclear energy could be easily transported. A small amount of uranium can produce a large amount of energy. The use of uranium to produce energy can make the country fuel independent since there is no need to import energy from other countries. The development in nuclear energy will help us in the field of nuclear science.   



In my point of view, I insist that solar energy is more ethical and reliable than the application of nuclear energy; however, the energy generation of solar power is not adequate and there should be nuclear power generated since massive amounts are possible to be generated with uranium. Nobody could guarantee that oil could be extracted from reservoirs 20 or 30 years from now due to environmental regulations, so the world should be capable of compensating for such a major energy source by depending on other alternatives which is considered to be renewable energy sources. The solar power is guaranteed to be a renewable energy source but considering the nuclear power as a renewable energy source or not is controversial; to clarify this point, if the uranium deposit could be proved to last as long as the relationship between the Earth and Sun is supposed to last (5 billion years) then nuclear energy should be considered as a renewable energy source. No other energy alternative could be produced in adequate amounts to compensate the viability of oil sources; therefore as a future prospect the nuclear power generation is viable and promising and these should be extensive studies performed to elaborate and implement nuclear power plants widely because the actual amount of uranium deposit available is way more than what is considered extractable right now.

 



 

 

References



 

No comments:

Post a Comment